How many insulins have you tried?  If you're like most people, you only switch to something spic-and-span when a better multiplication comes out, such as when Regular upgraded to Humalog or when NPH upgraded to Lantus. But when it comes to comparing insulin in the same fellowship, read Humalog versus Novolog operating theater Lantus versus Levemir, most of us only try something new when something goes real wrong, so much A ardent at the injectant site. Yech…

But what really differentiates them anyway?  Connected the international, there aren't many another distinct differences between Humalog, Novolog and Apidra. They are all rapid-acting insulin designed to enhance upon the classic Regular. They have a quick onslaught (between 10 and 15 minutes) and are generally are stunned of your system in a few hours. But if you ask an individual, "Which insulin cause you use?" you'll get a variety of answers and a variety of reasons.

When Apidra came to market in 2004, it claimed the title of amphetamine champion.  While Humalog was fast, and Novolog was quicker, Apidra was the fastest, according to manufacturer Sanofi-Aventis.  Actually, thither is nary scientific evidence that there are any John Major difference 'tween the different brands of speedy-performing insulin.  "I have seen zero reliable inquiry (id est, not conducted by an insulin company) showing any conflict in carry through times," says skilled John Walsh, Public address system, CDE, and generator of Pumping Insulin.  But many people — including many another Apidra users like myself! —  tranquil claim otherwise.

We surveyed the folks at TuDiabetes to gravel their impressions of how the different insulins take up affected their blood glucose, and several people responded with engrossing feedback about the new kid on the block up, Apidra.

Linzie, a type 1, switched to Apidra when she went on her insulin pump. "Apidra works really immediate compared to the Novolog I was taking," she says, "and it seems to be out of my organization faster."

Heidi agrees, saying, "I usage Apidra and have since I began pumping 9 months ago. Earlier expiration on the pump, I was on MDIs and using Humalog and Lantus for years. I think Apidra is most effective; information technology takes about as long as Humalog to begin working (~15-20min) just has a much shorter length, so it brings down highs quickly and has a small risk of hypos. I harbor't experienced any side personal effects or a major change in bolus dosing."

Melissa reliable Apidra after her endo gave her some free samples. "She wished-for feedback from patients currently pumping with Humalog," Melissa says. "She thought its more than rapid peak onset would constitute better for me because I had a tendency to bolus post-meal, which I eventually conditioned to stop doing!"

Others who responded indicated that they'd been connected the same insulin for so weeklong, they weren't ever competent to compare it with any sr. versions, or newer alternatives. Or, as Stacey expressed it: "I didn't rattling 'choose' to use them, information technology was reasonable what my endo prescribed."

Which begs the question, if we're so obsessed with finding the perfect insulin pump (and rightly so), shouldn't we be leastwise as concerned in what type of insulin goes into it and whether or not what we're using is the superior for us? Equally Bennett says, your diabetes May vary, so IT's a wonder wherefore near of United States of America are satisfied with whatever insulin our doctor two-handed over, often days sooner.

Have you test-driven whatever new insulins besides the unmatched you're using now? What were the results? Did you sting with the new type Oregon go back? Inquiring minds would like to know…